|
The Media’s Top 10
Economic Myths of 2005
See Executive Summary
“So
people at home right now are saying, ‘Economic slowdown? How slow is
it going to go?’ Are we headed for another recession?”
– Anchor John Roberts, “CBS Evening News,” April 15, 2005
The Gallup Poll reported in September that “half of Americans
say they trust the mass media to report the news fully, accurately,
and fairly.” Those three words – fully, accurately, fairly – each
communicate different ways the media can distort the news. They can
leave out pertinent information; they can report false information;
and they can tilt coverage toward one side or the other. Coverage of
Hurricane Katrina’s death toll on the Gulf Coast, now proven to have
been exaggerated and in some cases fabricated from hearsay, was one
grave example of the media’s failure in 2005.
The Media Research Center’s Business & Media Institute spent 2005 tracking
news reporting on business and economic issues and compiled a list
of the most common and most egregious errors. They ran the gamut
from omissions to exaggerations and plain misinformation. We have
visions of better coverage dancing in our heads for 2006.
10. America
should follow French fashion in business
Media Myth: France’s short
work week, benefits and loads of vacation time made it a workers’
paradise.
The
media have been saying this since 2001, when Katie Couric and
Matt Lauer fawned over France’s 35-hour work week and weeks of
vacation for workers. On the Aug. 1, 2001, “Today” show,
Couric gushed, “The French, they’ve got it right, don’t they?”
When Lauer suggested that “you know, I think they pay a lot
higher taxes than we do, from what I understand,” Couric
scolded him: “You had to spoil it. You just had to say
something.”
|

Audio |
Video |
Cut to 2005, when CBS’s “60 Minutes” continued the praise for French
leisure. Lara Logan described working (or not) in that country on
the June 29 show: “Full-time workers in France are guaranteed at
least five weeks’ vacation, guaranteed those long, lazy days in the
sun and leisurely lunches in outdoor cafes. On top of the five
weeks, there are another dozen public holidays and a maximum 35-hour
work week, with no paid overtime allowed.”
Amidst the long and positive report on France’s relaxed
work force, Logan did slip in that “the 35-hour work week, meant to
create new jobs, hardly made a dent in unemployment, which still
stands at over 10 percent – nearly double the U.S. rate.”
Tell the Truth:
With U.S. unemployment at 5 percent, France’s was exactly double
that rate. Logan mentioned in her June report that “Marchand says
money isn’t the top priority here. Maybe that’s because in France,
things like health care and education are virtually free.” It was
easy enough to mention that without explaining how that’s paid for –
as Lauer alluded – or examining any of the societal consequences.
As the Los Angeles Times reported on Oct. 17, 2005,
France’s “massive national bureaucracy strains to preserve costly
health and welfare programs, entrenched labor protections and
generous perks.” The Wall Street Journal reported on Feb. 9, 2005,
that “since the workweek was capped at 35 hours in 1999, France’s
productivity per capita has decreased 4.3% … over the same period,
productivity per capita has risen 5% in the United Kingdom and 6% in
the U.S.”
And that’s just the tip of the iceberg. Three weeks of
riots, arson and civil unrest showed that the bureaucratic socialist
system is anything but paradise.
9. We must
raise taxes to cope with ballooning deficits
Media Myth: Spending for
hurricane recovery and Iraq is driving the U.S. deficit out of
control. The only answer is to raise taxes to pay for it all.
Journalists have been incredulous that President Bush wouldn’t
immediately raise taxes to cover new expenses. Following
Bush’s Sept. 15, 2005, address to the nation, ABC’s Ted Koppel
said, “The last thing in the world that George W. Bush wants
to do is raise taxes, but the amount of money that we’re
talking about here, we’re talking about many, many, many tens
of billions of dollars. Can that be done without raising
taxes?”
|

Audio |
Video |
The media’s favorite suggested tax increase was
condemning the Bush tax cuts. NBC’s Tim Russert fantasized about
their end on the Sept. 25, 2005, “Meet the Press”: “The president’s
been very resistant to talk about tax cuts or certainly the repeal
of them. Is there any possibility he would say, ‘We have these
massive deficits. I believe in the war in Iraq. It’s going to bring
democracy to the Middle East. I believe in rebuilding New Orleans
and helping the people of Texas. But to the people in my income
bracket, I have to freeze the tax cut I had planned.’?”
Tell the Truth:
The media regularly distorted tax issues, treating the
federal deficit as though it is inherently bad. In reality, it is a
fact of federal accounting, and when viewed in context, the 2005
deficit came in at just 2.6 percent of U.S. Gross Domestic Product
(GDP). By comparison, the deficit in 1985 amounted to 5.1 percent of
GDP.
A repeated media call for the repeal of tax cuts
ignored the economic boom America has enjoyed since the cuts took
effect in 2003. GDP has grown by more than 3 percent for 10 straight
quarters, the unemployment rate has fallen to 5.0 percent, and job
growth has been positive for 30 consecutive months. Add to that the
fact that government revenue grew and the deficit decreased by $96
billion from fiscal year 2004 to FY 2005. But the media refused to
give credit to the tax cuts – in part, because they refused to
acknowledge that the economy is on solid footing.
8. Global
warming is causing stronger hurricanes
Media Myth: Thanks to the U.S.
rejection of the Kyoto treaty, global warming is on the rise and
warmer oceans are spawning deadlier hurricanes than ever.
ABC’s Bill Weir summed up that network’s take on the 2005 hurricane
season after his September 16 “Good Morning America” piece about
Hurricane Ophelia: “Scientists have long warned that global warming
could make hurricanes increasingly destructive. They couldn’t prove
it until now.” “CBS Evening News” reporter Jim Acosta ominously
introduced his November 29 report: “The experts have spoken, this
hurricane season will go down as the biggest, baddest, deadliest,
and costliest of all time.”
|

Audio |
Video |
Tell the Truth:
Global warming is not causing stronger hurricanes. Scientists,
including the hurricane experts at the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration, have said it many times, yet
broadcasters continued to suggest a connection. The New York Times
reported the facts in Kenneth Chang’s Aug. 30, 2005, article:
“Because hurricanes form over warm ocean water, it is easy to assume
that the recent rise in their number and ferocity is because of
global warming. But that is not the case, scientists say. Instead,
the severity of hurricane seasons changes with cycles of
temperatures of several decades in the Atlantic Ocean.”
And claims that this was the “deadliest” season on
record were far off base. According to NOAA, past hurricanes have
killed more than 8,000 people in the United States and possibly more
than 20,000 in the eastern Caribbean. Although the death toll for
Hurricane Katrina stands at the tragic number of more than 1,000, it
is false to say 2005 was the “deadliest” season.
7. America is
cheap with its foreign aid
Media Myth: At least our
good-hearted celebrities understand that compared to other nations,
America doesn’t give much to help the world’s poor.
The year 2005 saw a huge fundraising push from the series of
concerts known as Live 8. Rock stars and other celebrities drew
crowds and put pressure on the U.S. government to increase the
amount of its aid to Africa. Media coverage was based on the premise
that the United States was stingy. On the July 6, 2005, “NBC Nightly
News,” Kelly O’Donnell admitted U.S. donations were the highest in
the world, but stressed criticism of those numbers: “The president
can rightly claim the U.S. gives the most money in actual dollars.
But more revealing, critics say, is the U.S. gives the smallest
percentage of its wealth than any of the countries here.”
|

See Video |
Reporter Ron Allen took the same attitude three days
earlier on the same newscast: “Critics say smaller European
countries still spend a higher percentage of their income helping
Africa.” To emphasize that point, Allen interviewed Patrick Watt of
Actionaid UK, a British development organization that later came out
and criticized even the huge increase in funding that resulted from
the G-8 Summit. Unsurprisingly, Watt downplayed U.S. contributions:
“I don’t think it’s as major as perhaps the U.S. administration have
… have spun it as being. It’s, it’s quite small money in real
terms.”
Tell the Truth:
The figure used to criticize U.S. giving is the amount of
government aid as a share of GDP. Of course, the government can’t
dictate where GDP goes, because it’s not all government revenue. In
real dollars, U.S. contributions outpace the rest of the world. And
that’s only taxpayer-funded foreign aid money, excluding charitable
assistance and military aid.
Media reports ignored the billions given by private
U.S. donors. A June 2005 report from the Hudson Institute revealed
that private U.S. giving to developing countries totaled at least
$62 billion in 2003. That was three-and-a-half times the total of
Official Development Assistance the U.S. government handed out that
year.
6. Hurricane
Katrina will send the economy into a tailspin
Media Myth: With homes and
businesses destroyed and the nation’s oil supply hit, the United
States will surely hemorrhage jobs and head toward a huge downturn
in Katrina’s wake.
Such was the solemn prediction of Nell Henderson in the Sept. 3,
2005, Washington Post: “Hurricane Katrina, by forcing an exodus of
workers and families from New Orleans and surrounding areas, appears
likely to rank alongside Sept. 11, 2001, and the Arab oil embargo of
1973 as one of the nation's most serious and sudden economic shocks
– particularly in terms of job losses – in recent memory.”
Likewise, Joel Havemann of the Los Angeles Times
reported the same day that “Hurricane Katrina will probably end the
economy's 27-month streak of job gains. Katrina's effects – not only
on the Gulf Coast regions where it struck but also on the national
economy via higher energy prices and disrupted ports – could result
in the loss of as many as 500,000 jobs in September, analysts said.”
Tell the Truth:
Those analysts, and media reports, were too quick to predict
economic catastrophe. As with many gloomy prophecies of 2005,
Katrina’s epic job losses did not come true. The 35,000 lost jobs
initially reported for September were later revised upward into
positive job creation – though the media said hundreds of thousands would be lost
immediately. The “streak” of positive job growth now stands at 30
straight months even as the Gulf region continues to struggle.
GDP also continued to grow, reaching the surprisingly
strong rate of 4.3 percent in the third quarter. Unemployment held
steady despite the displacement of thousands of workers from the
storm-ravaged area. And the nation’s oil supply recovered far more
quickly than expected. The price of regular gas, which spiked to an
average of $3.05 per gallon following Katrina, began falling again
and is down to $2.18 as of December 14.
5. The housing
bubble is about to burst
Media Myth: The housing
market, white-hot for so long, is about to go bust and take you and
your home’s value with it.
The
media have been predicting this one for four years. Since
2001, reporters have been forecasting a crash in house prices
and harm to the economy. On the May 19, 2005, edition of ABC’s
“World News Tonight,” Elizabeth Vargas declared: “The run up
in housing prices is now beginning to look something like the
boom in Internet stocks, and we know what happened there.”
Betsy Stark added, “Elizabeth, housing prices do seem to be
defying gravity the same way stocks did not so long ago. And
the Federal Reserve is watching with an increasingly worried
eye. If the housing boom goes bust, there could be risks to
the entire economy.”
|

See Video |
The media have been predicting this one for four years. Since 2001,
reporters have been forecasting a crash in house prices and harm to
the economy. On the May 19, 2005, edition of ABC’s “World News
Tonight,” Elizabeth Vargas declared: “The run up in housing prices
is now beginning to look something like the boom in Internet stocks,
and we know what happened there.” Betsy Stark added, “Elizabeth,
housing prices do seem to be defying gravity the same way stocks did
not so long ago. And the Federal Reserve is watching with an
increasingly worried eye. If the housing boom goes bust, there could
be risks to the entire economy.”
Tell the Truth:
An investment “bubble” occurs when an asset appreciates by
extraordinary percentages for a short period of time, culminating in
a rapid decline that wipes away most of the gains. A perfect example
was the Nasdaq stock index, which went from roughly 1,400 in October
1998 to more than 5,000 in March 2000 (a 250-percent gain in less
than 18 months), only to fall back to about 1,400 by October 2001 (a
70-percent decline in about 18 months). But the housing market is
less liquid and prices don’t usually change quickly like stocks do.
The bottom line is, speculators are ones most hurt if
property values drop. Those who have invested in homes to live in
still have their investment. And when prices go down, it’s good news
for those who want to buy. Economists including Federal Reserve
Chairman Alan Greenspan have assured the public that a national
bubble doesn’t exist – local markets are where the ups and downs
occur.
4. Americans
are dying to be fat
Media Myth: America is
suffering from an obesity epidemic, so we’ve got to keep everyone
away from foods and beverages with calories. This has become the
nation’s No. 1 health problem and we’re dying at the rate of 400,000
a year.
|
The media have become obsessed with America’s weight. Whether it’s
children drinking too much soda and eating sugary breakfast cereals
or adults eating one too many Big Macs, journalists weren’t far
behind with a parade of food industry critics. On the Dec. 6, 2005,
“NBC Nightly News,” Janet Shamlian reported on yet another study
saying the food industry shouldn’t market toward children. Even
though the mother she interviewed said she made the decisions about
the food entering her household, Shamlian said, “But she's up
against a $10 billion industry, concerned her pitch for broccoli and
bananas is a tough sell.”
|

Audio |
Video |
Tell the Truth:
Shamlian’s focus on the food industry showed how personal
responsibility was often lost in reporting on obesity. The media’s
willingness to give anti-industry groups a platform led to lopsided
reporting that didn’t give the free market a fair shake. The Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention gave obesity scaremongers another
arrow in their quiver, announcing that excess weight caused about
400,000 deaths annually. After that figure was questioned late last
year, the CDC reassessed the situation and lowered its estimate to
365,000. But another study in April of this year showed that even
the adjusted total was about 14 times higher than the roughly 26,000
now believed to be correct. Neither the CDC nor the major media
publicized the new numbers. Instead, both continued the fight
against America’s “epidemic.”
3. Consumers
are choosing between food and fuel
Media Myth: Rising energy
prices mean there won’t be much in little Timmy’s stocking this
Christmas. Mom and dad can’t heat their home and buy food, so other
business sectors are going to get Scrooged.
The media acted as though gas prices were going to be the end of the
economy this year. Even before the hurricanes hit, CBS’s Trish Regan
was predicting drops in consumer spending on the April 10 “Evening
News”: “as costs go up, consumers, who are already getting hit
themselves at the pumps, may decide to cut back on their personal
spending.” Fellow reporter Mika Brzezinski answered that “consumers
cutting back can't bode well for the overall economy.”
As Christmas drew nearer and the weather grew colder,
the obvious switch was to hype heating prices and fewer Christmas
presents. CBS’s Jim Axelrod found an unfortunate woman who he said
could not afford a Christmas tree or presents for her child. On the
Dec. 13 “CBS Morning News,” Axelrod declared, “’Tis the season … of
cutting back.” And, on the December 10 broadcast of CNN’S “In the
Money,” Christine Romans said “for the elderly in particular, it's
going to be heat or eat.”
Tell the Truth:
Although individuals have been getting hit with higher
heating bills this winter, retail sales were far more robust than
expected. Shoppers haven’t given up on Christmas despite media
claims. The National Retail Federation announced that the weekend
after Thanksgiving, consumers spent almost 22 percent more than they
did the same time last year. And as far as the economy goes, media
worries about energy prices bidding up inflation were misguided. As
several economists have pointed out, one sector’s rising prices do
not produce overall inflation. In fact, rising prices for a
particular good can keep prices of other things down, because people
have less money to spend on those other items and therefore can’t
inflate other prices.
2. Big,
profitable companies are up to no good
Media Myth: Big money-makers
like the oil and drug industries should be sharing the wealth. Oil
companies were profiting off others’ misfortunes – laughing all the
way to the bank while you got squeezed at the pump. And Wal-Mart’s
business practices were just as bad.
Don’t
even get the media started on corporate America. Ever since
the Enron scandal, media skepticism of all things business has
increased. But journalists have been turning that skepticism
toward the free market and chiding businesses for making a
profit – the very thing they exist to do. NBC’s Brian Williams
opened an October 28 “Nightly News” report with “the outrage
across this country today everywhere people were ponying up to
pay more for gas” – even though drivers that day were actually
paying 51 cents less per gallon than they had during
post-Katrina highs.
|

Audio |
Video |
Anne Thompson’s story that followed included comments from people on
the street, one of whom said, “We’re all getting cheated,” and the
reporter closed by saying drivers wanted to “stop shelling out wads
of money to feed the profits that tonight have America fuming.”
Thompson had piled on the day before on the “Today” show: “while
American consumers have suffered through months of record high gas
prices, the oil companies have hit a gusher.” She later said “news
of these gargantuan numbers is sure to ignite the debate over how
much is too much in a time of crisis.”
Oil companies weren’t the only ones getting a tough
break in the media. Wal-Mart had perpetual PR problems throughout
the year, culminating in lopsided coverage of two documentary films
about the retailer. During the overwhelmingly negative coverage,
CNN’s Miles O’Brien called Wal-Mart’s public relations strategy like
“trying to put a little lipstick on a pig” on the November 16
“American Morning.” The food and pharmaceutical industries faced
similar attacks for selling products the public demanded.
Tell the Truth:
Prices go up when demand goes up. That simple economic rule was lost
on many reporters, who promoted attacks on oil companies for making
“too much” money or profiting from oil’s price spike. Some suggested
companies were “gouging” or trying to set prices higher, failing to
allow that when a business makes something lots of people want to
buy, it makes money.
The media also seemed to forget that publicly traded
companies like Exxon Mobil have millions of stockholders. That meant
it wasn’t one or two people profiting from the labors and
expenditures of everyone else – it was lots of investors benefiting
from their wise investments.
Whether it was the public relations challenges of
Wal-Mart or the layoffs at General Motors, the media rarely
addressed the negative impact of unions on businesses. Wal-Mart was
often vilified for fighting against unionization, while GM’s union
workers were pitied in stories about having to pay more for their
subsidized health care.
1. The U.S.
economy is hopeless
Media Myth: There are plenty
of reasons to doubt the economy. Gas prices; housing bubble; auto
workers losing jobs… the evidence is everywhere.
The theme encompassing all nine of the other myths was that the U.S.
economy is perpetually in trouble and on the brink of disaster. Even
when the numbers were positive, coverage remained largely negative.
Whether it was gas prices, hurricanes, heating costs, or the housing
market, reporters jumped to the worst conclusions imaginable. And
predictions were rarely if ever followed up with reality. When the
gloomy prophecies didn’t pan out, audiences weren’t likely to hear
about it. When the Labor Department announced jobs numbers for
October on November 4, showing job gains and a decline in the
unemployment rate, the media reported the gains as “surprisingly
meager,” “stalled” and “disappointing.”
CNN’s Lou Dobbs, on the April 28 “Lou Dobbs Tonight,” blamed a “huge
influx of imports into this country” for “literally choking our
economic growth.” With reports like that, it’s no wonder Dobbs
reported a “huge concern for the White House is the rising public
anxiety about the state and strength of our economy.”
Another CNN reporter, Soledad O’Brien, agreed on the
December 5 “American Morning” that “how Americans are feeling,
frankly … is scared. I mean, the war goes on, I look at my heating
bill. It may be triple what it was last year.”
Tell the truth: Evidence of a strong economy is
everywhere. Thirty straight months of positive job growth. Five
percent unemployment. GDP growing at an annual rate of 4.3 percent.
Gas prices nearly 90 cents lower than their post-Katrina highs. And
all this in the face of devastating hurricanes and oil supply
interruptions. As John Rutledge, an economist and chairman of
Rutledge Capital, put it on the October 8 edition of CNN’s “In the
Money”: “We have a $13 trillion GDP, we have a $155 trillion asset
base in the United States and no one, not Alan Greenspan, not the
Federal Reserve, not Katrina, not Rita, are going to knock that
over.”
|