Safe Under Any Conditions?
Offering young drivers a false sense of security
By Paul F. Stifflemire,
Jr.
Â
“Today, the U.S. has one of the world's lowest highway death rates.
There were only 1.51 deaths in the U.S. per 100 million vehicle
miles traveled last year [2002], down from 2.3 deaths per 100
million vehicle miles traveled in 1988.”
   Â
---from the Wall Street Journal, November 20, 2003
There you have
it. Traffic fatalities are down, not in overall numbers of course;
that would be impossible in a nation where, between 1994 and 2002
the number of drivers grew by 15.9 million, vehicles increased by
28.7 million and the number of miles driven was 472 billion greater.
That’s billion, with a “b.”
The media, however, continue to focus
on the trees, rather than the forest, often arguing against safety,
rather than for it. Rather than give credit where it is
due—individuals are behaving more responsibly—the media continue to
hype technology. This example comes from the Atlanta Journal and
Constitution. And if you think about it for a moment, you will
understand that the prescription being offered will likely increase,
rather than reduce fatalities:
From: “Technology is available to
reduce SUV rollovers,” by Joey Ledford
“Many sport utility vehicle
owners cite safety as a key factor in their purchase decisions,
unaware that many models are prone to roll over during aggressive
maneuvers. According to federal highway safety officials, more than
60 percent of all deaths in SUV crashes occurred in rollovers in
2002, compared with 24 percent of passenger car deaths. Midsize SUVs
are nine times more likely to cause rollover fatalities than other
vehicles. In all, rollovers resulted in 10,666 deaths last year,
about one-fourth of all U.S. highway fatalities. Technology exists
to prevent many of those rollovers, and even though it is being
widely employed on German and Japanese vehicles, American automakers
have been slow to embrace it. ‘It's frankly a cost issue in the
U.S.,’ said Jim Gill, a spokesman for Continental Automotive
Systems, a leading manufacturer of electronic stability control
technology. I test drove a Volvo XC 90 equipped with the
Continental Electronic Stability Control. Despite pushing it hard on
several revolutions around a wet circular skid pad, I never lost
control. I could tell the system had activated by the sound it made
--- a rather unpleasant roar similar to that made by fully engaged
antilock brakes.
Battling to cut costs, Detroit is holding back,
and federal safety officials are doing likewise, promising studies
and regulations within three years. Consumers don't have to wait,
however, and should demand this lifesaving option be included on
their next vehicle.”
While that sounds good, a look at the facts
behind the statistics indicates that the typical driver involved in
an SUV rollover is young, driving—as Ledford said—“aggressively,”
and engaged in a maneuver, much like he was, “pushing it
hard...around a wet circular skid pad,” that causes the vehicle to
roll. Adding a “safety feature” that convinces young, inexperienced
drivers (and their parents) that an SUV is safe under any conditions
is precisely the prescription for increased, rather than reduced
fatalities. It is impossible to make any car perfectly “safe,”
and it is irresponsible to pretend otherwise. |